TC is like Leatherman multitool for me: great for everyday usage, used very often and carry with me daily but for some tasks I need better tools around (i.e. So for my usage of XYplorer I still need TCĬode: Select all Comparetool=e:\soft\BeyondCompare4\BCompare.exe Not to forget I use TC for archive handling which is only rudimentarily in XY and needs scripts. I agree mostly with you but I have TC configured to compare files and sync folders,īecause this 2 functions are so bad in XY (almost unusable).Īlso I have configured TC as viewer in addition to the XY preview functions. And XY is getting some files properties built in with time. TC still wins with some plugins but with time it gets lower on my priority list. Preview panes, mouse-click zoom, translator app, scriptable custom columns (scripts are almost everywhere), Paper Folders, Tags database… I have never used tree views in TC but XY I use `em each time because Minitree can focus only on paths I am using. Why I am leaning towards XY, you may ask… "Minitree" is the one of the answers. Clo (rip) had great ideas, same with Lefteous but they sank with time. You may even see it with my activity on this board. I am afraid that with current development it may drop to 0 one day. In the past it had 100% of my time and now it decreases to 60%. I am still using TC daily but it is not the only file manager I use. TC may have thousands of items on TODO list we know nothing about and some feature suggestions wait for years to even get single comment. I would really see similar model of work for TC instead of some versions each year or so. Go to forum after that time and it appears there were dozen of betas or even 1 or 2 main releases during that time and a lot of features added. I forget to update polish.lng file for it for a month or two. It is not a function but development time for XY features is astounding.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |